Best Reviews Center

In-depth overviews from skilled writers

This content shows Simple View

Anita Morris

Advice on Detecting Bad Writing Services

Completing a myriad of assignments can be tiring, which is why more and more students consider opting for qualified essay writing services.

Nonetheless, before contacting the first company that crosses your path, note that some aren’t what they claim to be. Because of the growing demand for writing services, many of them aren’t reliable, which is why, in this article, we want to present a range of relevant guidelines on detecting the appalling services out there that’ll ruin your grades.

Determining the Quality of the Writing

The simplest way in which you can establish the reliability of a company is by reading numerous customer reviews and testimonials.

In these respects, the reviews for EssayMaster.com highlight that there is a grave concern regarding the preparation of the writers. Meanwhile, to make matters worse, when customers complain about the inappropriate quality of the writing, the problem isn’t addressed.

We experienced the same thing ourselves while testing the service. Therefore, this is what we would call a writing service you should steer clear of.

Analyzing the content of the website

Another way you could determine the reliability of a company is by scrutinizing the content on the site. We will refer, once more to EssayMaster.com, where you can find blog posts that are poorly written.

In our opinion, they might be the worst we have encountered. How could a company claim it provides professional services when the website is filled with grammatical errors? It is implied that our review highlights the same concerns.

When the prices don’t match the quality
We would also recommend you to stay away from companies whose prices are high, while the products they offer are subpar. Such an example is ResumeEdge.com. This is a company that supplies professionally written resumes, at appalling rates. We have ordered a resume, to see what the fuss was all about.

We concluded that the resume was average, but, definitely not the work of a professional. Those being said, we aren’t surprised that the rating of ResumeEdge.com isn’t the highest.
Furthermore, SmartWritingService.com is another company whose services aren’t as they should be. The prices fit within the average range; however, there aren’t any coupon codes or promo code listed on the website. We believe that each company should provide a range of convenient discounts.

Superficial customer service assistance
We consider that the client service support is a mirror of the reliability of a company. For instance, EssayLab.com claims that it provides assistance via chat and phone. We wouldn’t call that support, since the responses we received were the same, in spite of the questions we asked, namely to fill in the form and we will receive clarifications later on.
That isn’t the professional way to handle clients. Even though this company is not fraud or scam, we wouldn’t recommend it.
We could say the same thing about EnglishEssays.net. Getting in touch with customer service assistants is, indeed, challenging. Since they have pregnant foreign accents, you have difficulty in comprehending what they are saying.
Furthermore, when we inquired whether they could complete a dissertation in 48 hours, we were told yes, which is ridiculous.



311 Forum Response Thomas

311 Forum Response Thomas

Thomas, I agree that the structure of your organization as per your description is a functional one. The fact that there are few people in the organization illustrates that there is no need for complex organizational structures that may not be feasible or applicable to your situation. A functional structure is ideal considering that your work environment is stable in that you have a defined region within which you operate with your supervisor. In addition, since you and the supervisor do similar work it is prudent to assume that your job unit is specialized making a functional structures the best option for your organization. Another attribute of a functional organizational structure according to  is the reporting or organizational hierarchy system where you report to the supervisor and he reports in turn to his immediate boss. This system creates a functional hierarchical organization structure with a clearly defined chain of command.

However, your career field organization has an entirely different organizational structure considering that it combines both functional and flat organizational structure to create a hybrid matrix structure. Considering that the organization being described is military, the matrix grid structure is ideal since to distribute authority to different management centers where the different unit or team leaders report to single commander. Their matrix grid structure ensures that each unit is able to discharge its duties and responsibilities towards the attainment of a set goals. These could be coordinated to ensure that the different outcomes of each unit are combined to result in a single major outcome. Evidently, the organizational structure depends on the size, functions and goals of the various units within the organization.



Antigone by Sophocles

The play of Antigone reflects a state where one is in between complying with the stated laws and defying them. In most cases, there are those who would rather act against their will but instead ensure that they do observe all of the laws that are stated. In the play, King Oedipus passes on living two sons, Polynices and Eteocles who fight each other for ascension to the throne (Miller p49). It is at the stage that Creon, the two brothers’ uncle decides to assume kingship after the passing on of the two brothers (Schavrien p150). The play does bring out a time when one is in between having to uphold the stated laws and defying them. There are those who would decide to observe all the rules as has been portrayed by Creon. Also, there those who would choose to uphold their personal values and instead act as they feel is right even if the law does state otherwise. In today’s world, such instances are also common where there are those who have chosen to defy the law whereas other has taken to uphold the law. Sometimes it could be necessary to break the law for as long as one feels what they are doing is morally right. In the same regard, Antigone did right in breaking the law by going ahead to bury his brother’s body in defiance of Creon’s orders.

Antigone was right in the decision that she took to give her brother a respectable send-off. The death of Polynices and Eteocles was a fight out of the need to ascend to the throne. The fact that they were fighting and died in the event of the same did not warrant the action taken by Creon in deciding that one of them is not given a ceremonial send off. Creon did act in an irrational manner by choosing to pass an order that Polynices not be given a burial. The same was not justified since the law was made not to complicate the lives of those who are under it but to ensure that it brings sanity in those expected to abide by the same. There are instances when the law fails to address the contemporary issues at hand. As for the case of the two brothers, it is evident that they were people who need respect by virtue of their royal lineage. However, Creon clearly disrespects the same by deciding to treat one in an unfair manner as compared to the other. If it could have been justified for him, not to bury the Polynices, he would have suggested the same treatment for Eteocles. From the fight of the two, it cannot be clear on who is right or wrong. However, the fact does remain that they were both sons of King Oedipus and ought to have been treated in a respectful manner. Creon does overlook the same and instead decides to disrespect the rule of morality in how to treat the dead.An Incident Post Mortem on the Performance of Various Response Teams During a Disaster

In relating the story to the issue of Julian Assange of WikiLeaks, sometimes it is mandatory to break the law for as long as it is necessary and could bring to light some negative vices that may be happening. For example, in the case of WikiLeaks, there is information that often depicts some of the government officials in a negative way. The cheap deals engaged by some of them do come to light. The public has right to access the information for as long as it helps in stemming out the ill vice that does happen in the society. Most of the corrupt government officials have been found to be engaging in malicious activities that are not welcome. However, the law would require that such information not be made public for the sake of the public. It often has a public interest, and such information need not be made public. However, Julian Assange does violate the laws and instead makes the information public (Marlin). It is just as long as the issue at hand could be addressed by making the information public; then it would be alright to have the information public. Particularly, there is the case where he made public the personal information of the CIA director. In the event that the information released could relate to a controversial issue then it would be justified to have the information made public. What is of significant importance is that the law should be broken if it would bring a common good for the entire population.

There are instances when it can be mandatory to break the law. Such times could encompass a scenario where the law that is applicable does violate the morality surrounding the entire issue. For example, ordinarily, in the event that one was to pass on, it is moral to have them be given a fair send off that does respect them as human beings. It could have been necessary for Creon to bury Polynices in a manner that not only identifies him as the son of the ill-fated King Oedipus but as a human being. However, according to the fact that is performed by  writers, he does overlook the same and instead decides that he be left out so that the vulture and other creatures feeds on his body. It does call for the need to ensure that Polynices faces treatment as a human being. Creon chooses instead to uphold the requirements of the law and treats one of the brothers as being on wrong.

Antigone did make a right decision when it came to how she did handle the issue in a morally acceptable (Jack, Rand and Dana). One would view her actions as immoral and in defiance of the rule of law. However, on careful analysis, the same was right since she did what she felt was right and could be in the interest of everyone. Her actions can be confirmed to be right as per the prophecy made by Prophet Teiresias. The blind prophet does tell Creon that the gods were not happy with the decision that he made and that it would be right if he ensured that the burial of the body is in the right way, and Antigone released from the living tomb. Even though Antigone did decide to break the law, morally it was justified. The same can be a confirmation of the prophecy brought by the blind man. If Antigone were wrong, then the gods could not have been angry with Creon. It is a reflection that the law can often be broken at any time it is deemed fit or does indicate the violation of the moral laws.

The law is meant to help provide guidance as to how individuals need to live their lives. However, it should not appear as if one is a slave to the laws that could have been set. There should be room to modify the code so that it can suit an individual situation at hand.




top